Vegans miss the  larger point
Vegans miss the larger point
Vegans miss the larger point

Vegans love to buy things. We are surrounded by things we can’t enjoy—food, entertainment, clothing. When we find animal-free shoes, purses, snacks and cookbooks we snatch them up with reckless abandon. If a restaurant with vegan options pops up, we’ll line up out the door. When two vegans meet, their conversations inevitably focus on what stores and eateries they frequent. 

In the mad dash to fill our lives with alternatives to animal industries, vegans tend to miss the greater point of a lifestyle dedicated to making the world a better place.

Ian Paxson is a vegan and anarchist activist trying to find a balance between anti-capitalism and veganism.  

“Initially I became vegan because I believed that consumer choices were a meaningful and effective means of challenging industries that exploit animals,” Paxson said. “However, now I maintain a vegan lifestyle because it makes me feel better about the way I interact with the world around me, even though I recognize that it has virtually zero efficacy.”

Paxson has been vegan for five years, though he recently ate meat. After three weeks, Paxson returned to a plant-based diet.

“I don't believe that consumer boycotts are efficacious by any means and that they are valid only in so far as they make you feel better about yourself and what you are putting into your body,” he said.

“Even now, while I maintain a vegan lifestyle, I go back and forth on whether or not I call myself vegan. Vegan is a capitalist consumer identity. I'm not a capitalist and by extension, don't identify myself by what I do and do not purchase.”

Vegan alternatives are not inherently better for animals or the planet. Pleather and faux fur—staples of vegan fashion—are petroleum-based products. The environmental devastation caused by petroleum—climate change, oil spills, toxic water, acid rain, genetic mutations—are well known and vast. While many vegans will tout the environmental values of hybrid cars, bicycling, reusable shopping bags and eliminating demand for factory farms, the analysis rarely curbs the demand for couture. Sure, cows were not slaughtered for our beloved shoes, coats and belts. However, plenty of other animals were destroyed when their habitats were ransacked, covered in oil, poisoned and abandoned.

If the world as we know it were to go vegan, the dietary shift would not save animals or preserve land. Many of the plant-based products that vegans rely on come from subsidiaries of the largest food corporations. General Mills, Kraft, Heinz and ConAgra—big hands in animal industries—are the purveyors of some of the most popular soymilk, tofu, prepared food and meat substitute brands. (http://naturalsociety.com/wp-content/uploads/organiccompanieschart.png)

Industrial agriculture is no friend of the planet, nor does it preserve animal life. Soy (http://www.euractiv.com/cap/growing-demand-soybeans-threatens-amazon-rai...), a staple source of protein in many vegan diets, is responsible for massive deforestation in the Amazon rainforest. Perhaps community- or family-owned organic farms could reduce the environmental impact of our food choices. However, generating food supply that still allows for people to purchase food in grocery stores on demand with abundant selection with which the privileged vegan is accustomed to would require enormous expansion of current farming industry.

“I would even argue that industrialized veganism centered around wheat and soy production is worse for non-domesticated animals and the planet than an intelligently executed gatherer-hunter way of life,” said Paxson, who juggles this issue frequently.

While some opt for plant-based diets for health purposes alone, most vegans make the transition because they oppose the treatment of animals for the production of clothing and food. Animals are treated like commodities rather than living beings. They are forced to live torturous lives and are slaughtered cruelly. Ecosystems suffer from the massive demand for fuel, water and feed. What vegans must recognize is that the brutal treatment of animals and the planet is not a unique feature of food production, but an issue endemic to capitalism.

In capitalism, sentient beings get reduced to resources and products. This happens to humans, animals and ecosystems alike. A critique based solely on one dimension of this complex system dodges the greater issue.

In Paxson’s view, veganism is an act done for individuals.

“It is crucial to remember that it is never enough nor are an individual’s purchasing habits indicative of their ideological values,” he said. “It's also important to recognize the privilege inherent in being able to make those purchasing decisions.”

Capitalism is not an institution that can be changed internally. Boycotts and ethical consumerism shift money from one sector to another, still fueling the dominant system. They feed into the concept that those with privilege can maintain their access to goods and services on demand without ethical compromise.

Part of living on the privileged end of a capitalist society is choice. We have to decide how to live, knowing well that we are fueling a system that is destroying others. We do the best we can to impact others as little as possible. However, opting out of certain practices is not enough. To truly make a difference for animals - people and the planet - we must also work to dismantle the institutions that mandate suffering to ensure profit.

Categories: 

About author

Zoe Williams's picture

Zoë Williams is a Street Medic, artist, writer and anti-oppression organizer.

Daria's picture
Daria (not verified) Fri, 01/27/2012 - 14:19

You go Zoe!

Boo's picture
Boo (not verified) Fri, 01/27/2012 - 15:20

Good luck hunting and gathering, hahaha!

Liliana's picture
Liliana (not verified) Sat, 01/28/2012 - 13:01

Look, I get your point, mostly, but soy in the amazon doesn't go to vegans/vegetarians. We are not large enough a comunity to credit for all of it, Most of it goes to cattle.
I know other options, like faux leather and fur are terrible for the enviroment, yeah, but you can't deny the terrible impact fur farms have in it too.
A veganlifestyle is cheap. There's not going around that. Meat, eggs and dairy are all expensive products when compared to the vegan organic alternatives.
Soy is not something inherent to it either (while an important part of it for many, is not necessary in any way).
I'm not saying a vegan lifestyle has no impact in the enviroment, nor than there is no privilege to the knowledge that animals aren't ours and live for their own reasons.
But a non-vegan lifestyle is more toxic in every way, and there's no way anyone can ignore that.

sabelmouse's picture
sabelmouse (not verified) Fri, 12/21/2012 - 09:03

actually most soy is grown for vegetable oils used in all sorts of food and sold as cooking oils/margarine, the leftover mush goes to animals.

Liliana's picture
Liliana (not verified) Sat, 01/28/2012 - 13:01

Look, I get your point, mostly, but soy in the amazon doesn't go to vegans/vegetarians. We are not large enough a comunity to credit for all of it, Most of it goes to cattle.
I know other options, like faux leather and fur are terrible for the enviroment, yeah, but you can't deny the terrible impact fur farms have in it too.
A veganlifestyle is cheap. There's not going around that. Meat, eggs and dairy are all expensive products when compared to the vegan organic alternatives.
Soy is not something inherent to it either (while an important part of it for many, is not necessary in any way).
I'm not saying a vegan lifestyle has no impact in the enviroment, nor than there is no privilege to the knowledge that animals aren't ours and live for their own reasons.
But a non-vegan lifestyle is more toxic in every way, and there's no way anyone can ignore that.

Jessica Parsons's picture
Jessica Parsons (not verified) Sun, 01/29/2012 - 01:42

I'm a vegan and have always been anti-consumer. I'm not offended, I just think the premise for the article as represented by the first paragraph is flawed based on most of the vegans I know. Paxson's point of view is admirable, but not as groundbreaking as implied.

http://minimalistmum.blogspot.com/

camdemonium's picture
camdemonium (not verified) Sun, 01/29/2012 - 11:42

Reddit sent me here.

Your first sentence is an immediate red flag. Making such generalizations is not only misleading, but also irresponsible and shows your stereotyping of people as diverse as vegans. Let's take a look at some of the "facts" presented and hopefully we can all gain a better understanding. “Pleather and faux fur-staples of vegan fashion- are petroleum-based products.” I would hardly call these items “staples”, yet since you have already pigeonholed vegans as avid consumers I will give you the benefit of the doubt. However, let us also consider how much petroleum it takes to raise cattle, the source for leather, meat and a multitude of other products. In fact, the average cow consumes 284 gallons of oil in its lifetime (http://www.earthsave.org/environment/foodchoices.htm). Now let us move on to the part of your article that really perturbed me: “Soy a staple source of protein in many vegan diets, is responsible for massive deforestation in the Amazon rainforest.” Did you even read the article you linked to? Obviously not, because you missed the entire message of the article: “Although the deforestation is occurring within Brazil, it is the worldwide growth in demand for meat, milk, and eggs that is driving it.” Don’t blame vegans for the deforestation of the rainforest, in fact it is the demand for cheap, plentiful animal products that is causing this increased demand. Perhaps you didn’t know, but the majority of soy and corn grown around the world is grown for livestock feed. I won’t even dive into the detrimental effects of livestock production, but since you obviously have little knowledge on the subject here are some good places to start:
http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e00.HTM
http://www.fao.org/ag/magazine/0612sp1.htm

Debbie Deboo's picture
Debbie Deboo (not verified) Sun, 01/29/2012 - 15:17

I'm glad Paxon is only speaking for himself as he speaks not for me or any vegan I know.

Michael Morris's picture
Michael Morris (not verified) Sun, 01/29/2012 - 20:36

The author is missing the point that the reason soy plantations are rapidly encroaching on rain forests is not because of voracious vegans selfishly demanding more soy lattes, but because soy is being used to feed animals. When we all stop the inherent waste involved in passing all our food through a cow before eating it, and start eating soy, grains and other products directly from the soil, then we will require far less of them. Ecology 101. For every trophic level, the amount of input increases by about 10 x. Vegans eat at the lowest level. Those eating cow are consuming at the second trophic level and require 10 x as many resources. Those eating whale or fish-eating fish are at the 3rd trophic level and require 100 x as many resources.

sabelmouse's picture
sabelmouse (not verified) Fri, 12/21/2012 - 09:26

the leftover mush from oil production is fed to animals. let's stop using vegetable oils and margarine.

Pages

Post new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <b> <i> <u> <strike> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <th> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <blockquote> <hr> <span> <br> <font> <sup> <sub> <div> <iframe> <object>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Remove empty newlines at beginning of text (leaves alone newlines embedded in body)

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Related Posts