Credit: Manarchist Ryan Gosling
Credit: Manarchist Ryan Gosling
Manarchist Explosion:

Barely a day goes by that I don’t visit the Tumblr Manarchist Ryan Gosling. The site features photos of actor Ryan Gosling with reader submitted quips—captions often derived from personal experience—such as my favorite: “Hey Girl, I conflate feminism with fascism because both threaten me.”

The humor of Manarchist Ryan Gosling is that, anarchist or not, most activists know the type. He could be a Bro-gressive, a Mactivist or a member of the Manguard. The problem isn’t the ideology, but rather the contradiction embodied by a person claiming to fight for liberation, yet perpetuating sexism, heteronormativity and cis-sexism so overtly he resembles a cartoon.

And, though I giggle every time I see a new MRG submission, something is missing. While I have had my fair share of run-ins with violent, aggressive and blatantly sexist dudes within the movement, the manarchism I struggle with most frequently wouldn’t fit into a pithy meme. It isn’t overt or quotable, but I find it pushing me, and many others, out of spaces where we want to be. The sad reality is that the repeat offenders lurking in our communities are read up on bell hooks and probably enjoy Manarchist Ryan Gosling as much as I do.

Meetings are often a great bastion of subtle manarchism, particularly in regards to space. Privilege teaches us to find space and fill it. Often, this means taking space from others.

Sometimes this looks like a beneficiary of male privilege opining on the greatness of feminism and anti-oppression work for 15 minutes, leaving no time for other voices—often those experiencing oppressions—to speak. Other times, this looks like cis-gender men facilitating meetings, executing actions, leading working groups and doing the glamorous work, meanwhile leaving tasks such as cooking, cleanup, childcare and support work to the rest of us.

Manarchism also rears its head when someone—typically not a dude—calls out patriarchal behavior only to be met with resistance. While I have seen old-fashioned name calling, shouting and physical aggression employed by a manarchist getting called out, more often I have been silenced by having my concerns diminished. “I didn’t mean to,” and “You have to understand where I am coming from,” are two examples of how people frequently dodge accountability.

When I am spending time with male-identified folks and they are talking about women’s bodies—who is hot, who they want to date, what attributes they like—they have turned women into sex objects. They may not mean to, but their intention does not change the impact. When a dude in the community treats his partner terribly, the details of the relationship do not matter. Giving space to “both sides of the story” allows an opportunity for abuse, manipulation and manarchism to be justified.

These responses set a tone, not only in the immediate situation, but for an entire community that speaking out against male privilege opens one up to silencing.

Power structures emerge outside of meetings and mobilizations, too. I have seen gaggles of activist dudes treat their partners and friends like objects, property or a good old fashioned womb, all the while quoting Lucy Parsons.

Their infoshop conversations sound like locker room talk— “check out the hot new girl.” These men depend on their partners for support—food, rides, cigarettes—without reciprocating. They patronize their partners and make commitments in relationships. They bail when better prospects come along and move from partner to partner While the latter behavior can permeate across a variety of identities, 

 

the power dynamics that are perpetuated by manarchists reduce the women in our communities into sex commodities. This makes our “movements” look like reality TV shows with sexier politics.

The effect of all of this can be seen when those benefiting from male privilege dominate our organizations and community spaces. If your group ever has had to ask why a majority of your membership is made up of male-identified folks, it’s probably because of the manarchy. It may look softer and gentler than the hooded Manarchist Ryan Gosling shouting down ladies, but the silence, hurt and powerlessness manarchists inflict feel the same.

It is important to remember that, while male pronouns seem most applicable to manarchists, that male privilege—status, power, access and other benefits only given to men—can be extended to all people perceived to be male, even if that is not their identity. The key to deconstructing the power of manarchism is asking yourself—regardless of where your identity lands—“How do I participate or assist in creating this power dynamic?”

How does an individual or group start an anti-manarchist insurrection? Remember, talk is cheap. We can write statements, read books and discuss anti-oppression until industrial civilization collapses, but until individuals and communities actively engage in dismantling their internalized patriarchy, we are running in circles.

First make space. Take progressive stack in your meetings by giving people from non-dominant identities priority to speak. Dudes, when you go to meetings, stop talking and listen actively. Ask questions, support the ideas that others bring to the table and try to learn something.

If a person from a dominant identity makes a statement or action that upholds power dynamics, speak up. Support people when they call out power and privilege. Fill roles you have never filled before, particularly support roles. 

If you get called out—and you will get called out—listen and apologize. Don’t respond. Think about it. Educate yourself and make a definitive behavior change.

Above all, do the hard work to deconstruct patriarchy, particularly internalized patriarchy, within yourself. Do not look to women, transfolks or queers to coach you through your anti-patriarchal journey. Research, read, discuss, learn, teach and always remember that behind every activist with male privilege, there’s a little Manarchist Ryan Gosling. 

Categories: 

About author

Zoe Williams's picture

Zoë Williams is a Street Medic, artist, writer and anti-oppression organizer.

Melissa's picture
Melissa (not verified) Wed, 01/11/2012 - 13:24

Although I do think this article touched on a very important issue, I also see it as dangerously short-sighted. The arguments are presented in such a way that it gives the impression that these manarchists or activists who benefit from male privilege, do in fact have the power to silence womyn, or those of us who do not benefit from that privilege. I understand that due to some people's negative past experiences with male aggression, general aversion to masculinity, or any number of other triggers, it is uncomfortable for them to speak up when they feel they are "being silenced". I am personally under the opinion that space is not something that is allotted to us. Space is something that we must create for ourselves. This is true in many areas of our current reality living within civilization. No matter who you are, if you do not wish to exist in capitalism, that space is not given to you by the state. If we want to coexist in intentional communities, this is something we have to fight for. Of course this is not the ideal situation, but thus, here we are. My point is, that this is often a very uncomfortable process. I am not saying that it is up to all oppressed people to be expected to fight power dynamics that affect them in their own communities. I do think that our own intentional communities should be a place where we ideally would not have to deal with these issues. I am, however stating that we have grown too comfortable. These days, we as "the opresssed" expect everyone to understand our plight, and actively create a "safe space" for ourselves. Often times this "safe" turns into "comfortable". I have a huge problem with this. What happens when we are confronted with those who do not exist in our little oasis of comfort? sometimes we ostracize them, chew them out for not knowing about our struggles or the correct pronoun to call us, or merely make judgements about people we dont know. Often times these are people who are allies of this community, and I have seen them time and time again get pushed away for acting differently than people within our little social group. Have you ever wondered why there are so few black people or people of color within our community? Its probably because of the bullshit! Our community tends to ostracize people for not knowing the correct words to describe their anger with the current situation, or the correct way in which we like to interact (and socially police people into doing so too). Often times when people are not privy to that information they are pushed away (as I know I was in the beginning even as a homeless gender-queer person of color).
I am only expressing what I have seen and will continually act to try and prevent, and do not wish to tell anyone else how to act in any situation or throughout their life. I think it is extremely important to my own personal growth to feel uncomfortable sometimes. this is not to say that I would ever wish anyone to feel unsafe, but we have to distinguish the two. In the same way that i hope if a manarchist comes to a discussion group or talk in our community that he would feel uncomfortable and challenge his own opinions, I too want to challenge my opinions and judgements so that i may grow as a person. I also think in moving toward less cliquey and idealized reality within our little subculture, we can move toward doing more and talking less! I realize that i kind of went off on a tangent there, but i do see all of this as extremely vital to our growth as a community. I was going to go off some more about all of this, but I think i will wrap it up soon and wait for some responses. I am truly interested in what yall think about this so please comment and continue this discussion (including the author). I in no way feel that the author is wrong in their arguments, and want to make that clear. I merely think that it did not address a whole side of this issue that does in fact exist, and made a few judgements and assumptions that i am uncomfortable with.

Penny's picture
Penny (not verified) Tue, 03/06/2012 - 05:08

Just a quick reply to say I think you've made many vital points. Not knowing the common language can cause difficult situations, but unless anyone is willing to communicate with you in spite of this barrier, the barriers remain and the opportunity for two way growth is lost. Thank you.

EB's picture
EB (not verified) Thu, 03/08/2012 - 07:19

Fook (2002) talks about the fact that our modernist ideas of power leave no room for manoeuvre (so like you say, if men are in power, then there's nothing women can do) she says actually a concept of empowerment like this is dis-empowering (which I think is the point you're making). She outlines her less simplified, less black and white view of power in a way which not only makes more sense but also talks about the difference between blame and responsibility, her view of power is one where oppression is not insurmountable.

The dude's picture
The dude (not verified) Wed, 01/11/2012 - 16:33

Dear god, I'm a three degree white liberal male, product of a northeast liberal arts college, and have taken more women's studies classes than you can shake a stick at. I pray that this opinion piece is satire, but fear it is not, and feel kinda sad for you.

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified) Thu, 01/12/2012 - 16:44

YOU BEST BE TROLLAN

Andy's picture
Andy (not verified) Wed, 01/11/2012 - 22:02

Oh wow "The Dude" has taken women's studies classes and has a liberal arts education that was at least in part afforded to him by his white male privilege . That in itself seems to inform me that you missed the point of your women's studies classes. Your degrees do not mean you are educated and they most certainly do not mean that you in any way shape or form will ever understand the plight of women or other minority groups. You have always been on the other side of the coin so when a women or minority tells you that they are being oppressed in a space, acting in a mode of denial is only perpetuating that oppression. The greatest privilege is to see your privileges and still deny their meaning .

a's picture
a (not verified) Sat, 06/30/2012 - 09:14

are you from the 18 th century? women has every opportunity males have to get an education mixing that up with minorities situation is just silly

bro's picture
bro (not verified) Wed, 01/11/2012 - 22:57

i lolled

Sexist Pig's picture
Sexist Pig (not verified) Wed, 01/11/2012 - 23:51

TL;DR: Men are inherently sexist pigs and should be punished every time they show how male they are.

someanon's picture
someanon (not verified) Sun, 02/17/2013 - 15:01

Right on

Pages

Post new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <b> <i> <u> <strike> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <th> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <blockquote> <hr> <span> <br> <font> <sup> <sub> <div> <iframe> <object>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Remove empty newlines at beginning of text (leaves alone newlines embedded in body)

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Related Posts